Intelligence disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available information and is provided for general guidance only. It does not constitute legal, regulatory or procurement advice. Always verify directly with the relevant authority before making commercial decisions. Full disclaimer →
Regulatory · Customer Trust · AMP8

Trust in Water Companies Hits a 15-Year Low —
Here's Why That's a Supply Chain Problem, Too

CCW's annual Water Matters report puts customer trust in water companies at 6.07 out of 10 — the lowest score in the 15 years it has run the survey. Only 44% of customers think their bill is fair, a third consecutive annual decline. That's a reputational crisis for the water companies. But with AMP8 spending under constant political and media scrutiny, it's also becoming a live commercial factor for the contractors, consultants and suppliers delivering the work — from win-theme requirements in bids to how visibly "value for money" gets defined on site.

6.07/10
Overall customer trust score for England & Wales — down from 6.28, a 15-year low
44%
Customers who think their water charges are fair — a third consecutive annual fall
13
Water companies that saw their individual trust score fall this year
RegulatoryCustomer TrustCCWReputationAMP8Social Value

The Consumer Council for Water's (CCW) 2026 Water Matters report — its 15-year tracker of household attitudes to water and sewerage companies — makes uncomfortable reading for the sector. The overall trust score for England and Wales fell from 6.28 to 6.07 out of 10, the lowest recorded since the survey began. Thirteen of the sector's water companies saw their individual scores fall over the year. Only 44% of customers now think what they're being charged is fair — the third consecutive annual decline in that measure. Thames Water finished bottom of the table at 4.74; Northumbrian Water topped it at 7.02.

On its own, that's a story about consumer sentiment and regulatory politics. But it lands at a moment when AMP8's £104bn capital programme is under more scrutiny than at any point in the current price review — bill rises, drought restrictions, storm overflow performance and Ofwat's own enforcement record are all live stories running in parallel. For suppliers and contractors delivering that programme, declining public trust isn't background noise. It changes what water companies need from their supply chain, and it changes how visibly that work gets judged.

Northumbrian Water

Highest-Trusted Water Company
7.02/10
CCW Water Matters 2026
  • Only major water company to sit meaningfully above the 6.07 sector average
  • Completed award of its £780m AMP8 energy and gas framework this AMP — the sector's largest energy procurement exercise
  • A useful reference point for what "above-average trust" looks like operationally, not just on paper

Thames Water

Lowest-Trusted Water Company
4.74/10
CCW Water Matters 2026
  • Bottom of the trust table amid ongoing ownership uncertainty and financial restructuring
  • Still running a £1bn+ Major Projects Framework and multiple live AMP8 tenders in parallel
  • Suppliers bidding into Thames contracts should expect heavier scrutiny of social value and customer-facing conduct

Why This Matters Beyond the Water Companies Themselves

Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the wider "New Vision for Water" reform agenda all draw directly on public sentiment data like CCW's when building the case for tighter regulation, larger fines and closer scrutiny of company spending. A trust score at a 15-year low strengthens the political hand of anyone arguing water companies need to prove every pound of AMP8 investment delivers visible, accountable improvement — not just balance-sheet spend. That pressure flows downhill to the organisations actually doing the work.

Social Value Is No Longer a Bid Nicety — It's a Trust Lever

Water companies increasingly use supply chain social value commitments — local employment, community engagement, customer communication standards, environmental stewardship — as a visible, low-cost way to demonstrate accountability to a sceptical public. Expect social value weightings in AMP8 tender evaluations to hold steady or increase rather than soften, even where budgets tighten elsewhere.

What This Means for Suppliers and Contractors

1. Customer-Facing Conduct Now Carries Reputational Risk for Your Client, Not Just You

Any contractor working on customer-visible schemes — service disruptions, roadworks, property access, billing-adjacent digital services — is now operating in an environment where a poorly handled customer interaction can feed directly into a water company's next trust survey result. Water companies are likely to tighten customer communication standards and complaint-handling clauses in contracts as a result.

2. "Value for Money" Evidence Is Becoming a Differentiator in Bids

With only 44% of customers thinking charges are fair, water companies have a strong incentive to be able to demonstrate that AMP8 spend is efficient and well-managed. Suppliers who can quantify cost efficiency, reduced rework, and measurable outcome improvements in their bids — not just delivery capability — have a sharper story to tell into this environment.

3. Watch Thames Water and Other Low-Trust Operators for Tighter Governance Requirements

Companies at the bottom of the trust table, and those under the most acute financial or ownership scrutiny, are the most likely to add extra governance, reporting and assurance requirements to their supply chain contracts as they try to rebuild credibility with the regulator and the public. Expect audit, compliance and reporting-heavy roles — of the kind already appearing in Ofwat's own Independent Monitor appointments — to keep growing as a procurement category in their own right.

A Trust Problem Feeds a Regulatory Problem, Which Feeds a Procurement Problem

The chain runs: falling customer trust → stronger political case for regulatory reform and enforcement → water companies tightening governance, transparency and social value requirements on their own supply chain to manage reputational risk. Suppliers who treat social value and transparent reporting as a genuine differentiator — not paperwork — are better positioned as this cycle continues through AMP8 and into AMP9.

Timeline — What to Watch

May 2026
CCW publishes Water Matters 2026, recording a 15-year-low trust score of 6.07/10 and a third consecutive annual fall in customers thinking charges are fair.
Ongoing 2026
Ofwat continues an active enforcement programme (recent penalties include £11m against Wessex Water and £86m against Anglian Water and South West Water) alongside its £3.4bn Cost Change investment approval — both feeding the same public accountability narrative.
Through AMP8/9
Expect social value, customer communication standards and governance/assurance requirements to keep featuring more heavily in framework tender evaluations as water companies work to rebuild public trust.

Practical Steps for Suppliers and Contractors

Track the Regulatory Pressure Shaping AMP8 Procurement

Water Industry Hub tracks Ofwat enforcement, CCW reporting and the framework and tender changes that follow — and sends the ones that matter direct to Silver members every week. Understand the pressure your client is under before you walk into the bid.

View Silver Membership Talk to Us First
The information on this page was accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication, based on CCW's published Water Matters 2026 report (May 2026) and subsequent industry press coverage (Water Magazine, CCW.org.uk). The water industry moves quickly — company-level scores, regulatory responses and named enforcement figures can change. Water Industry Hub updates pages when material changes come to our attention, but we cannot guarantee that all information remains current. Always verify directly with CCW or the relevant water company before making commercial decisions. This content does not constitute legal, financial or regulatory advice.